05th Jan2013

Bad Aim

by Mr. Joseph

Okay…I’ve resisted talking about the Sandy Hook shooting last year because there’s nothing I can say. It was a tragic event, and the perpetrator will never be brought to justice because he killed himself. So, this is not about that – directly. This is about what the nitwit Wayne LaPierre and the brain farts in Congress have been saying since it happened. Basically, they’re blaming it on violent entertainment: TV, movies, and video games. In fact, Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va.) is asking for a study to see how violent games impact children. That, and people have been climbing the walls against entertainment they deem too violent for YEARS. In fact, there’s a town in Connecticut that’s offering to collect and destroy violent games.

Miranda Lawson. She is not amused.

This is completely stupid.

I’m 35 years old. I grew up in the era of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, and Steven Segal. I was raised watching movies like Predator, The Terminator, and Cobra. Watching Magnum P.I., Knight Rider, and Miami Vice was a rite of passage for me. I spent countless hours playing games like Contra, Mega Man, and Ikari Warriors. Hell, Commando has a scene where someone gets impaled through a steam pipe, and that – plus Schwarzenegger’s one-liner at the end (“Let off some steam!”) – is one of my favorite movie lines.

Paranoid people, allow me clue you in on a little secret: it ain’t the games. It ain’t the movies. It ain’t the TV shows. Kids get exposed to these things, sure. But, kids shouldn’t be able to buy these games, they aren’t supposed to get into these movies, and they’re not supposed to be watching these shows on TV. Know why? Because we already have a rating system that covers ALL of these.

In response to games like Night Trap, Mortal Kombat, and Doom, the Entertainment Software Rating Board was created. Established in 1994, it was created to assign ratings to games based on their content, i.e., someone getting shot in the face at point blank range. These ratings have been in effect for about almost 20 years now. If you’ve looked at a video game box recently, you’ve probably seen the rating plastered on the front.

ESRB Ratings (source: psychobuttons.com)

These ratings make it clear who these games are made for. I won’t let my 22 month old daughter watch me playing Mass Effect. Nor would I allow my 11 year old niece to watch me play the latest Call of Duty
game (primarily because I don’t like first-person shooters, but that’s neither here nor there). These games are rated M for a reason; they contain violent images and sexual situations. Where have we heard this saying before? Oh, yeah…the MPAA.

In 1968, the Motion Picture Association of America implemented its own rating system to replace the Hays Code (a fascinating read; find out more about the Hays Code here). In its infancy, it only had four ratings: “G” for General Audiences, “M” for Mature Audiences, “R” for Restricted (no one under 16 to be admitted without a parent or guardian, and “X” for Adults Only. Over the years, “M” gave way to “GP”, which changed to “PG”, and that’s what we had for years…until 1984. That’s when movies like Gremlins, Poltergeist, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and Clash of the Titans (the original one, not the worthless one featuring the wooden Sam Worthington) were released to unsuspecting children, and it effectively scared the crap out of them. As a result, the “PG-13” rating was created to delineate the difference between a movie that might scare some younger children. In 1990, due to the influx of porn films taking the “X” rating as their own – even though most of them weren’t rated in the first place, the MPAA created the “NC-17” rating. Thus, giving us the following ratings system we use today.

MPAA Movie Rating Poster (source: skyecinema.com)

In 1997, Congress, the television industry, and the FCC created TV Parental Guidelines. These guidelines were created as a tool to show parents what TV shows they may not want their young children watching. It also was created to be used in conjunction with the V-chip, which would censor shows with specific ratings. If you’ve watched TV recently, you’ve seen the ratings pop up in the upper-left hand corner of the screen. If you’ve watched a procedural, you’ve seen it every half hour.

TV Ratings (source: armstrongarmor.com)

Now, I’m sure you’re wondering why I took you on this trip down memory lane. Well, the answer is simple: we have a system in place to handle these things; we’ve had it for years. All it requires is a bit of common sense and proper implementation. The fault doesn’t rest on the entertainment industry; it rests with the consumers – specifically the parents and/or guardians who allow their charges to consume the offending media.
That doesn’t necessarily mean that all parents aren’t doing their jobs, nor does it mean that all sales reps aren’t adhering to the guidelines. However, it DOES mean that some of them aren’t.

Kids aren’t stupid; they’ll ask an adult to pick up a game for them – even though they know they aren’t supposed to play it. They’ll either sneak into a movie or ask an older cousin to get them in one. They’ll wait until their parents are summarily distracted so they can watch The Walking Dead. Instead of taking a look at everyone else, take a look at your immediate circle; you just might find the solution you’re looking for.

Of course, that’s just my opinion; I could be wrong.

31st Jul2011

Thumbs Up, Soldier!

by Mr. Joseph

I paid a visit to the movies today for the first time in a couple of weeks, and I knew exactly what I wanted to go see. I may have missed out last weekend, but I was bound and determined to check it out this time. Today, I went to go see Captain America: The First Avenger. The Paramount Pictures/Marvel Studios production – rated PG-13 – stars Chris Evans, Tommy Lee Jones, Hugo Weaving, Hayley Atwell, Sebastian Stan, Dominic Cooper, Neal McDonough, Derek Luke, and Stanley Tucci. The movie is meant to to serve as the final tentpole in next year’s superhero blockbuster The Avengers. It’s known by many comic book fans, but not so much by everyone else outside of the imagery itself. Will this be the strong tentpole like Iron Man and Thor, our would it be a bit wobbly like Iron Man 2? Only one way to tell for sure.

The movie begins in present-day, where a couple of S.H.I.E.L.D. agents are summoned because someone found what looks to be an airship buried in the Arctic. Upon further investigation, they find a red, white, and blue artifact iced over in the wreckage. The movie then shifts to Tønsberg, Norway in 1942, where Nazi officer Johann Schmidt (Hugo Weaving) is searching for a tesseract which will provide the ultimate power for the ultimate weapon. Meanwhile, in a time where people are being drafted for service, Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) is trying to enlist in the Army for the fifth time. Unfortunately, he is rejected just like the other times due to his health and physical issues. Meeting up with his old friend James "Bucky" Barnes (Sebastian Stan), they attend the Stark Expo being presented by Howard Stark (Dominic Cooper) and Rogers again attempts to re-enlist. This time, he is greeted by a German defector named Dr. Abraham Erskine (Stanley Tucci). Erskine sees something in the frail, sickly Rogers and allows him to join. During boot camp, he meets Colonel Chester Phillips (Tommy Lee Jones) and Agent Peggy Carter (Hayley Atwell) of the Strategic Scientific Reserve; where Col. Phillips is nonplussed at the miniature recruit, Carter sees something that Dr. Erskine saw as well. Rogers is selected to be the recipient of the scientific Super Soldier Serum. The procedure is a success, but it comes at a high cost, and the movie takes off from there.

So, what worked in this film? Well, for starters, the idea to place the bulk of the film during World War II was nothing short of a stroke of genius. Certain movies work well in the element it’s supposed to be in, and Captain America is definitely this movie. In fact, I think it’s one of the few Marvel movies that won’t work well in a modern-day setting. The character of Captain America is so keenly based in the ’40s, that it would feel awkward to tell his origin story in any other time. Chris Evans does a fantastic job of playing Steve Rogers as a man of character and great conviction, and it really shows in his portrayal of the frail Rogers. Now, there have been multiple stories on how Evans played the frail Rogers, but it was great how he did it. The rest of the cast performed admirably, and I really love how they actually treated Carter with respect instead of treating her like "some dame." I really loved Hugo Weaving in this; his character sounded muted and calm, but his actions certainly spoke louder than words.

What didn’t work? Well, not much, and the little bit that didn’t seems a bit petty. For starters, where I loved frail Steve Rogers, I only liked healthy Steve Rogers. I understand why he played him like he did, but the frail Steve was more convincing to me. Another thing was the score. Don’t get me wrong, the score was great; my problem was that it was a bit overstated at times. In the grand scheme of things, both are minor gripes. Another problem I have doesn’t come from the movie itself, but to some people who complain about how they handled the multiracial Howling Commandos. Just a quick bit about the Howling Commandos, they’re an elite Army battalion comprising of a Brit, an Irishman, a Frenchman, a Black man, and a Japanese man. Most people aren’t complaining, but there are some people who are saying that the inclusion of Derek Luke is an insult to the brave black soldiers of WWII. To them, I say, shut up. It’s a work of fiction; get over it, and get over yourselves.

The movie was directed by Joe Johnston, and he does a spectacular job of directing the stuff during the 40s. In fact, some of the best stuff takes place in the 40s. That shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise; one of Joe Johnston’s best films is the grossly underrated The Rocketeer. It’s kind of difficult to say how he directs the modern day stuff, because it comprises the totality of about 20 minutes of screen time, but it’s rather immaterial in the grand scheme of things. The point is, he makes it work. Alan Silvestri did the score for the movie, and I’ve already discussed how I feel about it.

All in all, I really did love this movie. Everything worked well, and the movie was certainly a sum of its parts. It looked beautiful, it sounded beautiful, and it was a good time. So, with that in mind, I’m gonna consider this movie to be 4.5 times More Epic Than Love Jones. The only reason it didn’t get a full 5 was due to the fact that I got bored with the score. Other than that, it was definitely worth the price of admission, and it’s definitely serves as a wonderful setup for The Avengers next year.

Bravo Zulu, Captain!

31st Jul2011

Take It To the Limit

by Mr. Joseph

This weekend has pretty much been a movie weekend for me. Be it at home or at the theaters, I was determined to watch as many movies as possible. With that in mind, yesterday was a Blu-ray kinda day for me. I watched Source Code on Friday, so watching that on back-to-back days was out of the question (you can read my review here). Instead, I decided to pop in a movie I had been looking forward to for a while, but just never got around to it. So, with that in mind, I decided to pop in Limitless. The 20th Century Fox/Relativity Media production – rated PG-13 and based on a novel called The Dark Fields by Alan Glynn – stars Bradley Cooper, Abbie Cornish, and Robert DeNiro. I had heard wonderful things about this movie, but I had no idea what to make of it myself. What did I think of it? Keep reading to find out.

The movie begins with someone trying to break into a heavily fortified apartment in New York City. It’s resident, Eddie Morra (Bradley Cooper), is seen standing over a ledge debating whether or not to jump before whoever is at the door gets to him first. The movie then flashes back to an earlier time, with Eddie being a burned out writer, struggling to finish a book that he hasn’t put minute one into. His girlfriend Lindy (Abbie Cornish) has just broken up with him, and he is wandering aimlessly trying to figure out what to do with his life. He then runs into his ex-wife’s brother Vernon Gant (Johnny Whitworth), who offers him a pill called NZT to help unlock the full potential of his brain. Reluctantly, Eddie takes the pill, but he then realizes that the effects kick in immediately. He writes the first three chapters of the book he had been working on, and he begins to notice a change within him. Going back to Vernon’s for more information, he finds out that the pill isn’t necessarily legal, and it comes with some pretty serious side-effects. Vernon is killed, Eddie finds his hidden stash of pills and money, and the race is on for Eddie to protect his own neck, finagle his way into making millions dealing with a Wall Street shark named Carl Van Loon (Robert DeNiro), and discover a way to counter the dangerous side effects he discovers with the pill.

What worked for this movie? The leads were incredibly convincing. Bradley Cooper really shines in what is considered by many to be his breakout role, Abbie Cornish plays the part of the love interest well, including unlocking the full potential of her brain herself in order to evade a would-be assailant. The one I was most impressed with was Robert DeNiro. At this point in his career, he has a tendency to be a bit overstated, that is, he can overact by a mile. In this movie, he was more subdued than anything. He was reserved and business-like, and he only reared the late-career DeNiro near the end of the film. That was nice to see, because it’s becoming a rarity nowadays for him.

What didn’t work? A couple of things, including one that actually impressed me at first glance. The main thing that did it was the science. The prevailing myth that we’ve been told for most of our lives is that we only use 10% of our brain, and the rest of it is apparently sitting there like an unemployed version of Al Bundy with its hand in its pants drinking a beer. The truth of the matter is that we actually use 100% of our brain, but we only use it at certain points. If we were to use the full 100% of our brain, we would surely lose our minds. In fact, there is a point in the movie where he meets up with his ex-wife who was taking the pill only to realize that she was unable to concentrate on anything for longer than 10 minutes. The other thing was the end of the movie itself. It was entertaining, but it flies in the face of the science itself. Also, the end was explained differently in the alternate ending, and that actually has a bit more credibility to it.

The film was directed by Neil Burger, and it was directed with a incredibly beautiful visual flair. The cinematography itself was very beautiful, with experiencing Eddie go through his trips being a joy to watch. There is a fight scene set in a subway station that is filmed elegantly, with the fight itself being interspersed with scenes from various old videos about how to fight, as well as scenes from Bruce Lee movies. The score was done by Paul Leonard-Morgan, and it was fairly nondescript. In fact, I don’t really remember a whole lot of the score at all. If memory serves, it was a bit techno, but it wasn’t much to write home about.

Despite what I felt was a hokey ending, I did enjoy the movie. It was a fun romp, and I had a good time with it. I’m not going to rank it above Source Code, but it was very entertaining. With that in mind, I have no problem with considering this movie to be four times More Epic Than Love Jones. It was definitely a good look into the mind of a man who is able to unlock his full potential through the miracle of science.

After that, the opportunities are limitless.

21st May2011

Steady Tide

by Mr. Joseph

pirates_of_the_caribbean_on_stranger_tides_ver9_xlgAs the Summer Blockbuster season continues in full swing, so do the movies themselves.  Today’s movie hearkens a return to the swashbuckling pirate Captain Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides.  The Walt Disney Pictures film – the fourth in the successful series based off the amusement park ride – stars Johnny Depp, Pénelope Cruz, Ian McShane, and Geoffrey Rush.  This movie has been billed as a return to what made the first film such an instant classic: a stand-alone story and the witty banter that only Johnny Depp can provide.  Does it live up to its lofty expectations, or does it falter much like At World’s End did?  Only one way to find out for sure.

The movie in Spain, where a couple of Spaniards find a body tangled up in their line.  Thinking he is dead, they go to try to retrieve his effects, only to find out that the man is still alive.  They take him to the King of Spain who finds out that the old man knew of Ponce de Léon, and that he was one of those looking for the Fountain of Youth.  The king orders an expedition to take effect immediately, and this gets to King George (Richard Griffiths).  King George issues Captain Hector Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush), now a privateer for the British Navy, to go search for it.  Meanwhile, Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) is on dual duty: he’s trying to save his first mate Joshamee Gibbs (Kevin McNally) from the gallows as well as trying to find out who’s impersonating him to set sail for the Fountain of Youth.  Along the way, he runs into Angelica (Pénelope Cruz) and the fearsome Blackbeard (Ian McShane), and the chase is on, with the Fountain of Youth being the ultimate goal.

At this point, I would normally go into detail about the principal characters and the actors portraying them.  Not this time, though; this time, I’m going to talk about what worked and what didn’t.  So…what worked?

PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: ON STRANGER TIDESWhat worked for this movie was the witty banter.  The movie moved along briskly when there is a healthy amount of conversation between Jack Sparrow and Angelica, or Jack Sparrow and Barbossa, or Jack Sparrow and Blackbeard.  The dialogue was crisp and the flow was smooth.  The score also worked…somewhat.  Hans Zimmer returned to deliver a pretty good score, and the themes for Blackbeard and Barbossa work well when they’re interwoven with the right scenes.

What didn’t work?  Well, like I mentioned above, the movie moves briskly when the principals are involved with each other.  When they’re not – which really does happen a bit – it’s sluggish.  There are points in the movie that it’s slow regardless of what the main cast does, but it picks up when they get to White Calf Bay. Until that point, it meanders a bit much.  There is also a subplot featuring a Christian missionary and a mermaid that felt completely out of place and I feel the movie would’ve been a whole lot faster without them.

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011)<br />
JOHNNY DEPP and PENELOPE CRUZRob Marshall replaced Gore Verbinski as the director, and he did a fairly decent job with what he was presented.  There have been a lot of complaints about the action scenes not being filmed well, and that is pretty true up until the mermaids themselves arrive.  When you see them onscreen, they are mystifying…until they reveal their true colors, at which point you’re stunned with what you see.  Not only that, another one of their scenes is particularly frightening, and let me just say that those ain’t seagulls you’re hearing.  Like I mentioned, Hans Zimmer did the score, and it did work for some parts.  At times, the score seemed a bit muted, and that’s not what you expect from a Zimmer scored film.

I enjoyed this movie, but it was painfully obvious that something was missing.  There were points that I could have done without, and points I would’ve loved to see more of, but the whole is a sum of its parts.  What those parts are is subject to your own interpretation, but it wasn’t that bad.  With that in mind, I feel confident in rating this movie three times More Epic than Love Jones, and it’s a competent matinée flick.  Whether you choose to see it in 2D (like me) or 3D is up to you, but it’s a pretty good time overall.

30th Apr2011

Expecto Patronum!

by Mr. Joseph

Harry_Potter_logo

Everyone the world over should’ve realized what this was about when they saw the title, but if they didn’t, they do now.  Yes, this is about the Harry Potter film franchise.  The films have all been released by Warner Bros. Pictures, and they star Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Richard Harris, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman, and Ralph Fiennes.  The movies have been rated from PG to PG-13 for their various uses of magical violence and situations that may be deemed too tense for children.  The movies tell the story of Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) a young wizard who has been dubbed by everyone in the magic community as the Chosen One.  While studying at Howgarts, he meets and befriends Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) and Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) and they go on various adventures to not only learn more about themselves, but to stop an evil wizard known as Lord Voldermort (Ralph Fiennes).  For those who are bigger fans than me, yes; I’m aware that I just did a very brief synopsis of all seven books and (to date) seven movies.  Take a deep breath; you’ll be okay.

How did I get engulfed in Harry Potter?  I’ll tell you.  On December 4th, ABC Family had a marathon of the first five films.  How many did I watch?  None.  I didn’t watch any of them, but that was because I was unaware of the marathon until I saw mention of it on Twitter.  I found out that it would be back on the next day, so I set it in my mind that I was going to watch them then.  I had been intrigued by the trailer for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, but I didn’t want to start in cold; rather, I wanted to start from the beginning and work my way up.  This marathon gave me that option.  I started in late (The Sorcerer’s Stone was at least an hour and a half in at the time), so I was kind of unaware what was going on.  Thankfully, it was fairly easy to follow.  After I watched that one, I went on to the second one…then the third…and before I knew it, I was crawling into the bed at 11:30 after watching all of them.  After that, I was hooked.

Like I mentioned above, there have been seven movies done so far, and I’ll discuss seven of them here.  Why not all eight?  Because The Deathly Hallows, Part 2 hasn’t been released yet.  Be patient.

harry_potter_and_the_sorcerers_stone_ver5_xlgHarry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone

First things first, I know the poster says “Philosopher’s Stone;” I like that poster better.  Oh, sure; I could’ve gone with the one that had the boats going into Hogwarts, but I decided to use this one instead.  It’s just as good.  Anyway, every story has its beginning, and this is the beginning of the Harry Potter franchise.  We meet the principal characters as they set out to find the Sorcerer’s Stone and prevent He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named from getting his hands on it and coming back to life.  As beginnings go, it’s a pretty good one, and the kids really hold their own in this movie.

 

harry_potter_and_the_chamber_of_secrets_ver3_xlg

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

To be honest, this one bored me.  This movie is the weakest of the series, and it’s not the fault of the actors.  The trio held their own and the addition of Kenneth Branagh as the ridiculously named and dressed Gilderoy Lockheart was beautiful casting.  Unfortunately, the story wasn’t told well, and I wasn’t really impressed at all.  This signaled the end of Chris Columbus as the director of the series, and it even made John Williams’ great score seem mostly mundane.  It’s a shame, because the story looks like it lends itself to the screen well.  It just didn’t work out in this one.

 

harry_potter_and_the_prisoner_of_azkaban_ver4

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

If Chamber of Secrets was the worst to me, then Prisoner of Azkaban was the best.  The trio began to grow into their own, the story was brilliant, the score was phenomenal, and the addition of Alfonso Cuarón as the director was a spectacular choice.  The movie introduced the great Gary Oldman as Sirius Black, David Thewlis as Remus Lupin, and Timothy Spall as Peter Pettigrew.  This also brought in Michael Gambon to replace Richard Harris as Dumbledore, as Harris passed away after the second one.  This is just a spectacular film in general – not just a spectacular Harry Potter film.

 

harry_potter_and_the_goblet_of_fire_ver7

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

It’s hard to follow a great movie with another great movie, so I’m not too mad that Goblet of Fire dropped the ball a bit.  That’s okay, though; it was pretty good.  Dumping Harry into a tournament originally designed for three wizards was pretty clever.  Bringing in Brendan Gleeson to play the appropriately named Mad-Eye Moody was great, and he actually made the movie.  The movie brought about the rebirth of Lord Voldermort, played with tenacity by Ralph Fiennes.  The action was great, and the effects were very well done.  Mike Newell did a very good job with this one.  The score was blasé, but you can’t win them all.

 

harry_potter_and_the_order_of_the_phoenix_ver10_xlg

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

One of the great things in the Harry Potter franchise is that you really get to see the actors grow and evolve.  This movie shows their growth in spades.  On top of that, you get to see a really great wand duel between the forces of good (Dumbledore’s Army and the Order of the Phoenix) and evil (Death Eaters). We also see an epic battle between Dumbledore and Voldermort.  David Yates takes the directing helm, and he deftly guides his young cast through the rigors.  This one also introduces a great villain in Dolores Umbridge; she’s just annoying enough to be sinister. Another good one in the series.

 

harry_potter_and_the_half_blood_prince_ver19Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

The tagline for this one says it all: “Dark Secrets Revealed.”  This is definitely truth in advertising.  We find out one character isn’t as he seems, and another one has taken the wrong path.  All isn’t bad, though; romances are realized, hearts are broken, and epic battles wage on.  This one has a very sad ending, though, as we bid a fond farewell to one of the most beloved characters in in the franchise.  Of course, the reason we’re saying goodbye is due to the insidious deeds of another…or was it really insidious?  Only time will tell…

 

 

harry_potter_and_the_deathly_hallows_part_i_ver5_xlg

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1

I wrote about this one already, and my feelings haven’t changed on it from that review.  If you missed it, you can check it out here.  Just to add, I love it when a movie ends unconventionally.  Although it makes sense for it to end how it did, that doesn’t make it any more enriching.

 

 

 

On July 15th (currently), the epic finale to the franchise comes to theaters, and I am really looking forward to that.  That being said, if they released it one day before, that would be the best birthday present ever.

At any rate, I’ve been watching the trailers quite a lot since it was released, and it’s only served to get me even more ready.  But, until then…

EXPELLIARMUS!

02nd Apr2011

Crack the Source

by Mr. Joseph

I had the (increasingly) rare free moment today, and I was able to spend it by doing what I do best, and that’s go to the movies.  Today’s movie selection is the action thriller Source Code.  The Summit Entertainment production stars Jake Gyllenhaal, Michelle Monaghan, Vera Farmiga, and Jeffrey Wright.  I had seen commercials and trailers for this movie for a while, and I was intrigued to see how it would all play out.  I like a good thriller as much as the next person, but the question was how would this work on screen.

The movie begins with Captain Colter Stevens (Jake Gyllenhaal) waking up on a train in the body of Chicago schoolteacher Sean Fentress.  Disoriented and confused, he finds himself sitting in front of a woman named Christina (Michelle Monaghan).  He hurriedly tries to make sense of what’s going on, but before he can start putting the pieces together, a bomb goes off and kills everyone on the train.  He awakes in a pod, where he is greeted by Air Force Captain Colleen Goodwin (Vera Farmiga).  She lets him know that he is inside something called the Source Code, and that he has eight minutes to find the bomb that killed everyone on the train.  Every failure brings him back to the pod with only a few moments to spare before returning back to the train.  He also finds out that the first bomb was a test run, and that there is another one geared up to destroy Chicago.  With constant urging from Dr. Rutledge (Jeffrey Wright), he sets out on his mission, which ends up being a race against time.

My previous experience with Jake Gyllenhaal was with that disastrous Prince of Persia movie.  I didn’t know if I was ready to give him another shot so soon, but I decided to go for the ride.  Suffice it to say, this was the right decision.  Gyllenhaal has a great sense of humor in this movie, and he handles the action scenes well.  His actions as the reluctant hero are phenomenal, and his transition to being the hero everyone thinks he can be is virtually seamless.

Michelle Monaghan is charming in her role.  The last time I got a good look at her was with Mission: Impossible III, and she’s good at playing the virtual damsel in distress.  With the constant jumps that Stevens takes, it’s great to see Christina’s character evolve and come out through the various interactions with Stevens/Fenteress.

Vera Farmiga and Jeffrey Wright play the overseer and the project director, respectively.  I lumped these two together because they have great chemistry onscreen.  Farmiga’s role as Captain Goodwin is firm, but caring, and she performs it well.  Wright’s role as Dr. Rutledge was more stern and effacing, with his only focus being on the mission itself, and not caring about what Stevens is actually going through.

The movie is directed by Duncan Jones, and he is able to strike the balance between action and humor effortlessly.  He is more recognized for directing the Sam Rockwell vehicle Moon, but he does a great job with the Ben Ripley script.  Chris Bacon does the score here, and it’s almost heroic in some scenes and subdued when it calls for it.  The main theme plays on Stevens’ heroism, and it’s something that carries throughout the film itself.

This movie felt very familiar to me, and it didn’t take long for me to figure out where the familiarity came from; in fact it came within the first ten minutes: Source Code reminds me of Quantum Leap, with Gyllenhaal playing the part of Sam Beckett and Farmiga doing a very good impression of Admiral Al Calavicci, so much so that Sam Beckett himself – Scott Bakula – has a bit part in the movie.  I really liked that show, and it helped to allow me to enjoy the movie that much more.  This is a taunt little thriller, and with a running time of about 93 minutes, it doesn’t overstay its welcome.  The movie creates its own universe, and it dares you to come along for the ride.  I don’t think I’m going out on a limb to give this movie four times More Epic than Love Jones.

After all, this is a definite case of the past affecting the future.

 

13th Mar2011

Social Networking, Movie Style

by Mr. Joseph

social_network_xlgThis has been an entertaining week for me, and in order to end it on a good note, I felt the need to watch a movie.  I had been hearing rave reviews about The Social Network – not to mention the success it had during awards season, so I decided to give it a go.  The Columbia Pictures film stars Jesse Eisenberg, Andrew Garfield, Justin Timberlake, Armie Hammer, Max Minghella, and Rooney Mara.  I have to admit, that the premise of the movie was a bit bizarre, but it was intriguing.  I mean, let’s be honest here; the basic idea of a movie about Facebook is enough to make you sit and scratch your head and wonder why anyone would want to watch that.  However, the execution of the movie is just phenomenal.

The movie begins in 2003 at a bar near Harvard University.  Erica Albright (Rooney Mara) is trying to have a conversation with Mark Zuckerberg (Jesse Eisenberg), but Mark is busy bouncing through several different conversations at once.  Eventually, Erica gets to the point and ends their relationship.  In a drunken rage, Mark writes a scathing blog about Erica and gets the idea to create a website rating women on their looks side-by-side.  Hacking into every house at Harvard, he uses an algorithm created by his friend Eduardo Saverin (Andrew Garfield) and creates FaceMash.com.  The site itself proves to be incredibly popular and it crashes the Harvard servers overnight.  Of course, this doesn’t endear him to the female population on campus, and he receives a six month academic probation based on crashing the server.  He also gets the attention of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss (Armie Hammer) and Divya Narenda (Max Minghella).  They have an idea for a site called HarvardConnect.com, but they need someone who is a brilliant programmer.  They set up a meeting with him, and pitch him the idea.  What happens next is a cavalcade of epic proportions, including meeting the founder of Napster, Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake), incorporating the site, and lawsuits galore.

I’m honestly not familiar with Jesse Eisenberg’s body of work, but I hear it’s unique.  It’s my understanding that he was the guy you get if you couldn’t get Michael Cera.  After this movie, I think it may be safe to say that Michael Cera is now the guy you get if you can’t get Jesse Eisenberg.  He plays Mark Zuckerberg as a jittery college kid who gets over being jilted by creating the social networking service of a lifetime.  He plays Zuckerberg like an asshole, and he has a one-track mind about things.  He means well, but he doesn’t quite get it when people are mad at him.

Andrew Garfield is spectacular in this movie as Eduardo Saverin.  Looking at him onscreen is like watching a brilliant painter at work.  I wasn’t quite familiar with his body of work, but I will be soon.  His calm demeanor is a beautiful contrast to Eisenberg’s frenetic pace.  You could tell that Saverin had a lot of concern for his friend, and when you see his reaction when things go south, it’s poetry in motion.

Armie Hammer and Max Minghella are great performers in their parts, but I have to admit, Hammer is incredibly phenomenal as the Winklevoss twins.  Yes…twins.  One person played two people, and not only did he play it well, he gave them completely different personalities.  Of course, they had to use Josh Pence as a body double for one of the other twins, but it was still spectacular to see him basically act to himself.  Minghella plays Divya Narenda as an angry genius who wants to get the ball rolling in paying back Zuckerberg for what he’s done.

Rooney Mara plays Erica Albright, the woman who ends up becoming the muse for the social networking site that defines all social networking sites.  You don’t see her on the screen a lot, but her presence is felt throughout the entire film.  Not only that, but she stares daggers through Zuckerberg and you feel the hurt and angst that she feels for him.

The movie was directed by David Fincher, and it was a brilliant piece of work.  He frames the movie wonderfully, and every shot counts.  He directed a script that came from the brilliant Aaron Sorkin, and the dialogue pops with every word the cast says.  If there is anyone out there who wants to learn how to write a screenplay (raises hand), this is the guy to learn from.  The music was fantastically done by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, and it fits every scene.  I was disappointed that it beat out my personal favorite composer – that would be Hans Zimmer, but after watching this movie, I can see why it did.

There are certain movies that define a generation, and The Social Network is definitely one of them.  It is a brilliant piece of work, and the tagline for the movie fits.  It is definitely true that you can’t make friends without making a few enemies, and I can’t even imagine making 500 million friends with the natural amount of enemies.  I rate this movie at a five on the More Epic Than Love Jones scale, and if you haven’t seen it, you should.

You won’t be disappointed.

27th Feb2011

Just Plain Greedy…

by Mr. Joseph

While waiting for the Oscars, I decided to look at my burgeoning Netflix queue and find something to kill the time while I do some housework and get ready for the Oscars (You can read about it here).  The movie I settled on was the classic 80s masterpiece Wall Street.  The 20th Century Fox film stars Michael Douglas, Charlie Sheen, Daryl Hannah, Martin Sheen, and Terence Stamp.  I must admit that I had been hesitant about watching this movie, although I’m not quite sure why.  It’s a classic form of cinema, and it helped to sculpt the financial world as we see it today.  In fact, according to this article, it’s even made Wall Street what it is today.  So…it was time to make it my mission in life to see how good it actually is.  Suffice it to say, it’s pretty good.

The movie starts with junior stockbroker Bud Grant (Charlie Sheen) struggling to make a living and try to make it to the top.  He spends a majority of his time trying to get involved with his idol Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas), while trying to be an honest man like his father Carl (Martin Sheen).  Carl’s a blue collar worker for Bluestar Airlines, a small company with big goals.  After lots of wrangling, Bud manages to get a meeting with Gekko, and the first go around isn’t the greatest in the world…in fact, it’s safe to say it was on the verge of failing miserably. All of that changed when he realized that his father had given him inside information.  This led to the beginning of a partnership between the two…for good and for ill.

This movie just had splendid acting from all members.  The scenes with Michael Douglas and Charlie Sheen are splendid, whereas the scenes with father Sheen and his son were great as well.  They times Daryl Hannah was on screen was definitely worth paying attention to, while Terence Stamp tends to play the heroic foil whenever he steps on the scene.  In fact, it’s pretty awesome to see how his presence even trumps the greatness that Michael Douglas has.

The movie is directed by Oliver Stone, and he’s at his level best in this movie.  The way he frames his scenes are just fantastic.  There are certain scenes where they’re standing in front of a window, but he casts shadows on him to set the mood for the scene itself.  The score is by Stewart Copeland, and it’s fairly unmemorable, what with its incredible synthesized beats.

I’m really disappointed in myself. I wish I would’ve seen this sooner.  I definitely enjoyed watching Michael Douglas in what would become his most memorable role, and seeing Charlie Sheen go toe to toe with him was fun as well.  Everyone had a part to play, and they played it well.  This movie warrants four More Epic than Love Jones, and it was a fantastic two hours.  The only reason it doesn’t hit all five is because the look really doesn’t stand the test of time.  The story is top notch, though.  In this case, greed really is good.

13th Feb2011

Apocalypse Now

by Mr. Joseph

Superman-Batman-ApocalypseNetflix is a wonderful thing.  For $8 a month, I can stream just about anything I want to my PS3, iPod Touch, or laptop.  Today, I chose the laptop to kick back and watch Superman/Batman: Apocalypse.  The Warner Bros. Animated feature brings back the voices of Tim Daly, Kevin Conroy, Susan Eisenberg, and Ed Asner.  It also adds the voices of Summer Glau, André Braugher, and Julianne Grossman.  As someone who’s enjoyed the films from the DC Animated Universe, it was my hope that it wouldn’t disappoint.  Suffice it to say, it didn’t.

Endowed with powers equal to Superman’s, Supergirl (Summer Glau) splashes down on Earth in the midst of a hail of Kryptonite. No sooner has she landed than the problems begin for Superman (Tim Daly), Batman (Kevin Conroy), and Wonder Woman (Susan Eisenberg), who must rescue her when Darkseid (André Braugher) and Granny Goodness (Ed Asner) nab her. To thwart Darkseid’s plans to make Supergirl one of his Female Furies, the trio must work with Barda (Julianne Grossman) to confront the powerful enemies Darkseid has assembled around his control center in Apokolips.

There are three voice actors that I really get a kick out of hearing, and they are Tim Daly, Kevin Conroy, and Susan Eisenberg.  They were the richest of the voices in the DC Animated universe, and it was great to hear them take their iconic roles again.  They were joined by the distinctive voices of André Braugher, Ed Asner, and Summer Glau.  Braugher brings an air of regality to the sinister Darkseid, whereas Ed Asner returned to the role of Granny Goodness, playing the evil leader of the Female Furies with a hint of sadistic glee.  Summer Glau stepped into the shoes of Kara Zor-El, and she performs admirably, if not a bit stilted early on.

The movie was directed by Lauren Montgomery, and she did a pretty fair job of handling everything; however, I think the animation itself could’ve been a bit better.  The music was done by Braden Kimball, and it was completely and totally unmemorable.

I enjoyed this movie.  The animation didn’t sit too well with me, nor did the lackluster score, but the story was rich and the action scenes were intense.  Those alone are enough to rate this as three More Epic than Love Jones.  It’s a great follow-up to Public Enemies, and it’s a fun way to sit through a Sunday afternoon.

superman-batman-wonder-woman-apocalypse

31st Dec2010

A Hallowed Beginning

by Mr. Joseph

harry_potter_and_the_deathly_hallows_part_i_xlgAs my NYE tradition, I decided to go take myself to the movies.  Today’s movie was Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1.  The Warner Bros. release stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Ralph Fiennes, Alan Rickman, and Helena Bonham Carter.  This franchise has been a blockbuster since day one, and I hate the fact that it took me so long to get into them.  When I went into the movie, I expected nothing less than mayhem unleashed, and it didn’t disappoint.

The movie begins on a sad note as Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) was forced to cast a spell on her parents to keep them protected, Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) sending his uncle, aunt, and cousin away, and Ronald Weasley (Rupert Grint) looking over the horizon at the coming storm.  The movie then picks up the pace, as they round up the gang to protect Harry from Lord Voldermort (Ralph Fiennes) and his Death Eaters.  This sets up a confrontation over Little Whinging as Dumbledore’s Army and the remaining members of the Order of the Phoenix take on the Death Eaters in a thrilling aerial battle.  Lives are lost, and – after a brief reprise for a wedding – the trio set forth to find the Horcruxes and destroy Lord Voldermort once and for all.  Along the way, Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) is named the head of Hogwarts, and Dolores Umbridge and the rest of the Ministry of Magic set forth to persecute any half-blood wizards or Muggles and perpetuate their belief in only pure blood wizards.

harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallowsTo watch Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint over the years, they display a wealth of chemistry and familiarity with each other.  It’s been wonderful to watch them grow into their characters and grow into themselves.  They are all wonderful actors and it’s fun to see their interplay.  Radcliffe and Watson have a scene that really shines, and they’re almost in the same vein as John Steed and Emma Peel from “The Avengers.”

My favorite of the trio was Rupert Grint; he had a lot to do in this movie, and he didn’t disappoint.  He showed great range in his emotions, and you actually felt the jealousy Ron felt with Harry and Hermione’s closeness.  Of course, it came to play later in the movie, but it was fun to watch it get there.

Ralph Fiennes is given a lot to do with Lord Voldermort, and he really shines in this one.  Voldermort is evil personified, and Fiennes revels in playing the bad guy.  He chews scenery like it’s pizza, and it’s a sight to behold when he really sinks his teeth into the part.  Alan Rickman doesn’t have a lot to do, but he plays Snape with menace and a hint of remorse.

bellatrix-lestrangeWatching Helena Bonham Carter onscreen is scary.  She really acts bedazzled and unstable – much like how Bellatrix Lestrange really is.  She had some moments that really creeped me out, and that doesn’t happen too often.  For that to happen from this movie was a testament to her performance.

David Yates returns to direct this movie – his third in the series – and he shows his experience and familiarity with the cast.  The silent parts of the movie are filled with depth, and he handles the action like a seasoned pro.  The cinematography was done by Eduardo Serra, and the only real problem I had with it was that it was too dark.  That may be the result of the theater I was in, but I couldn’t really tell for sure.  Alexandre Desplat handles the score, joining such composers as John Williams, Patrick Doyle, and Nicholas Hooper.  His score is more muted, but it doesn’t slack on emotion.  The tenseness of the situation at hand was simply breathtaking.

I really got a kick out of this movie.  The thing I enjoyed most about it was how they bucked tradition with the start of the film.  Most of the films start off lighthearted and funny, but this one couldn’t be bothered with that.  This one started sad and really didn’t lighten up.  There was one moment of frivolity, but even that was short-lived, as more despair came into play.  I don’t think this is spoiling anything, but it even ENDED sad.  That was something I had personally been hoping for, and it finally delivered.  It definitely got me in the mood to watch Part 2…just in time for my 34th birthday.  I’ll give this movie four More Epic than Love Jones; not giving it five just yet, because I want to see the finished product.  Until then…

Expecto Patronum!

Harry-Potter-Deathly-Hallows-Wallpaper-1

Pages:123»